Poets And Theologians

Reformational Christianity and the various related theological tributaries which connect into it in various ways have a rich poetic tradition.

Even totally ignoring continental Europe, there’s a lot to work with. If you look at 17th and 18th and early 19th century England and America, you find many significant poets, and poet-theologians. For instance, consider: George Herbert, John Milton, Michael Wigglesworth, Edward Taylor, Anne Bradstreet, Anne Steele, John Bunyan, Richard Baxter, Andrew Fuller, John Dryden, Ralph Erksine, etc to name a few.

However, there was more to it than just a list of people who wrote poetry.  If you read the treatises and sermons from that era, the work of pastors and theologians such as John Flavel, Jeremiah Burroughs, or Anthony Burgess, you will find peppered in them a significant amount of citations from various Greek and Roman poets, such as Virgil and Homer.  And, beyond that, there is even a sense in which the sermons and letters of the tradition could be considered “poetry”. For instance, in one edition of the letters of Samuel Rutherford, the editor said that Rutherford “had so much of poetry and sublime enthusiasm in his soul, that any poet could sympathise with him to the full. Many of his letters…are really strains of true poetry.”

If we fast-forward over to late 19th and early 20th century American Christianity, we see many examples of appreciation for poetry.  J. Gresham Machen, who is well know for his defense of Biblical Christianity against liberal theology, is also said by Henry W. Coray to have been a “lover…of poetry”. And any familiarity with Machen’s work that extends beyond a surface level will reveal this. Machen, in his lectures, sermons, and writings, was often referring to poetry and poetic form. Another example, would be Geerhardus Vos, who is probably better known for being a pioneer in “Biblical Theology”. Did you know, however, that he was also a very accomplished poet, producing eight volumes of poetry and some several hundred miscellaneous poems? (see The Poetry of Geerhardus Vos by George Harnick)

Is this great tradition continuing? It’s debatable.

On the one hand, clearly the “torch” is being continued. A popular example of this would be John Piper, who consistently writes poetry. Michael Haykin writes some great poetry. And Southern Baptist Theological Seminary professor Jim Hamilton has tried his hand at poetry recently and I’ve enjoyed reading what he wrote. And certainly there are many others.

On the other hand, though, it seems clear that on the whole, there is a strong reason to doubt whether poetry holds the same level of esteem in the broadly Reformed movement nowadays as it the years past. In fact, sometimes it almost seems it is being intentionally downplayed in some areas.

Back in 2008, Michael Haykin said: “It is noteworthy that when Andrew Fuller was deeply moved, he would recite out loud lines of poetry that expressed the deep emotions he was feeling. Poetry, though, has largely fallen out of favour with many Christian thinkers and theologians since then. This is a real shame. There are some things that poetry can better express than theological discourse”.

And in an issue of Credenda Agenda, Peter Leithart said: “We are devotees of the Word, people of the book. Yet we can’t write stories or poetry. This is a scandal”.

I hope for many years to come, those of us who could be called “Reformed”, in some way–depending on our gifts, continue to kindle this wonderful gift of poetry, whether through reading or wriing. That’s all I have to say for now, but I think I may pick up this thread in the future.

12 Responses to “Poets And Theologians”

  1. Awesome post Mark! I hope that the tradition lives! You are doing a good job it helping it along with your own poetry too.

  2. mark says:

    Thanks Bro!

  3. Vince Cancilla says:

    It might be worth adding that metrical forms of poetry are even more in decline than free verse, and that to me is to be further lamented, considering the rich technical heritage people like Milton, Donne, and Dryden, for example, worked in (going all the way back to Homer, Virgil, Chaucer, etc). The majority of the poets named in your post were highly skilled linguists who dealt with rigorous forms and metrics in creating poetry which was highly rhetorical and stylized. This is an almost unknown art nowadays. I’m not writing off free verse and other forms of poetry, or trying to romanticize the ancients (true beauty is to be found in all forms of poetry), but similarly to the advent of abstract art, I believe poetry has suffered deeply in the loss of more technical approaches to versification. There is just something dazzling when the skill of the form enhances the message of the poem that for me is undeniably magical.

    Keep writing brother, you’re an inspiration in your indefatigable efforts in the blogosphere and in your writing!

  4. mark says:

    Vince,

    Thanks for the encouragement and for linking,

    In regard to what you say about metrical forms, I agree. There is a richness that is lost in the way the current poetry scene often dismisses attempts at metrical poetry, rhyming, and forms which are more on the rigorous side.

    I would go so far to say that I think even free verse has suffered from the lack of attention paid to these forms you mention. II think different poetic forms, if they are given a fair place, tend to improve each other through synthesis, etc. I

    ‘m quite sure some people out there who scoff at poetry, do so simply because they have an image of poetry in their mind that is limited to a small slice of what is actually poetry, a fraction of postmodern free verse.

    I definitely see a bias against meter, rhyming, etc. in modern poetry circles. I think the assumption is often that “it was good back then, but now its always bad, cliched, trite, etc.”, I’t s a very knee-jerk reaction.

    My general thought is that poets would do well to be thoughtful (whether explicitly or implicitly) about what form fits each poem they write. And of course, that is all within the framework of the constraints of their abilities, preferences, etc. too.

    As you put it, there is something “dazzling” in some of the rigorous metrical forms. And free verse poets have a lot to learn from them–both in terms of trying their hand at them and doing some synthesis. Unfortunately, many are not willing to learn, reader, or accept the validity of them! And because of that trend, it’s very easy to become sheltered in a “free verse world” and think nothing else exists or matters.

    Anyways.. just my thoughts :-)

    Have you ever read Rhyme’s Reason: A Guide To English Verse by John Hollander? If so, I wonder what your thoughts of it were. It’s an creative concept. It’s basically a guide to all the major forms of English verse, ancient and modern, written within the forms themselves. I enjoyed it–though I did feel quite out of my depths at times and I think I need to do some more reading. Any other suggestions?

  5. Vince Cancilla says:

    Mark, I think you’re comments are bang on….there are many facets to the downgrade of poetry in the popular mind (especially post-modernist art), and maybe I’m just a pessimist, but it seems to be a widespread tendency in many spheres of art… the more discipline and training and technical knowledge required, the less popular and practiced the form. I’ve not read Hollander…didn’t he translate the Divine Comedy? I read “The Art of Poetry Writing: A Guide For Poets, Students, & Readers” by William Packard a while back, very helpful reference, and for a lighter read, “An Introduction to English Poetry” by James Fenton was good.

    (p.s. due to CAPTCHA code errors your blog thinks I’m a possible spam bot!)

    • mark says:

      Vince,

      Thanks for the suggestions… I’ve found that Fenton’s book is in the local University library. I plan to pick it up some time.

  6. [...] Ontario with his dear wife and their baby daughter and blogs at “All Things Expounded,” where this article first appeared. It is used with [...]

  7. Bob Emery says:

    As for poets in the grand tradition, remember that Edmund Spenser was a member of the Church of England, and the Fairie Queene has definite protestant themes. In the 16th century, the CofE, of course, was strongly Calvinist in theology (how things change!).
    Bob Emery

    • mark says:

      Bob, Good point! It is clear that–even with a narrow definition of who to include–my list is missing important figures.

  8. [...] go along with my previous post, here are some brief biographical details and anecdotes which help to further underscore some of [...]

  9. [...] posts on the blog All Things Expounded, on the subject Poets and Theologians (part 1 | part 2) tipped me off that Charles Haddon Spurgeon (1834-1892), the great nineteenth-century [...]

  10. [...] rich poetic tradition of Reformed Christianity and asks whether this great tradition will continue (part 1 | part 2). HT: The Aquila [...]