Looking at the Epistle of James – Intro

To go along with my personal reading of the Epistle of James, I plan to be posting a series of posts with some quotes on the epistle. The main point will be to encourage further study and give valuable insight on this book of the Bible. Here is the first post,  introducing the epistle and giving some macro-level information. Of course, I think we should give first priority to the epistle itself, but I think some of these thoughts help in understanding the epistle better.

Method and Message

  • “All through the book of James you get the feeling that there’s the undertone of the Sermon on the Mount. Jesus is almost the primary teacher, as James articulates his lessons. In many ways, then, James is a practical commentary of application of the Sermon on the Mount. And his goal, by the way, is the same as that of Jesus, to convince his audience that their religion and their religious profession and their religious activities will not benefit them at all unless they manifest true godliness from the heart.” – John MacArthur in a sermon on James
  • James provides clear, practical instruction throughout the letter. This is why so many people love this book. Of course, that is why so many people avoid it as well. We want practical advice…the kind that agrees with what we already think. But James is not concerned about telling us what we want to hear. No, he lines up one truth, and then he lines up another; and then, having his listeners just where he wants them, he delivers a third hard-hitting truth right to their situation with all the force of the first two points behind it.”  – Mark Dever in The Message of The New Testament
  • “The Epistle of James is one of the most exciting parts of the New Testament. It has hard-hitting punch and a reality-oriented attitude that catch readers unaware and astound them, while also offering them practical guidelines for life.” – Peter H. Davids in the New International Bible Commentary
  • “[James] is a book which is rich in spiritual dynamics. It will be motivating and sobering in its message. It is a book of faith, a book of promise and a book of warning.” – John Stevenson, PCA Pastor
  • “The apostle wrote it upon the same reason, to wit, to prevent or check their misprisions who cried up naked apprehensions for faith, and a barren profession for true religion. Such unrelenting lumps of sin and lust were there even in the primitive times, gilded with the specious name of Christians. ” – Thomas Manton in his exposition on James
  • “You will notice, just perusing this letter, that this letter is about ethics. To be more specific, it’s about Christian living. It is a very practical letter, but that doesn’t mean it’s an easy letter to read. It’s very easy to understand, but James is so plainspoken that he steps on our toes. And we need that. We need God, by His divinely inspired word, to step on our toes, to enter into our comfort zone, to make us uncomfortable with our sins, to convict us of it and to spur us on to righteous living. And that is precisely what this little book does. It is a moral exhortation. It is an exhortation to Christian living not only as individuals but also in our light in the community, in the family of God.” – From a sermon preached J. Ligon Duncan at Faith Presbyterian Church in Jackson, Missouri in 2002

Authorship

  • There are many proofs that the epistle was written by the author of the speech in Acts 15:13-21—delicate similarities of thought and style too subtle for mere imitation or copying…There are, besides, apparent reminiscences of the Sermon on the Mount, which James may have heard personally or at least heard the substance of it. There is the same vividness of imagery in the epistle that is so prominent a characteristic of the teaching of Jesus.” – A.T. Robertson in Studies in the Epistle of James
  • “In 1:1 the author identifies himself as ‘James, the servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ.’” – Daniel Wallace in James: Introduction, Outline,and Argument

It Is Neglected

  • “[James] has been a neglected book, for ever since Luther called it an epistle of straw lacking the wheat of the gospel…, Protestants in general have struggled with the work. The result has been that the work has been pushed aside” – Peter H. Davids in the New International Bible Commentary

In Defense of James

  • “There are also at this day some who do not think [the Epistle of James] entitled to authority. I, however, am inclined to receive it without controversy, because I see no just cause for rejecting it.…Though he seems more sparing in proclaiming the grace of Christ than it behooved an Apostle to be, it is not surely required of all to handle the same arguments. The writings of Solomon differ much from those of David; while the former was intent on forming the outward man and teaching the precepts of civil life, the latter spoke continually of the spiritual worship of God, peace of conscience, God’s mercy and gratuitous promise of salvation. But this diversity should not make us to approve of one, and to condemn the other.” – John Calvin in his commentary on James
  • The objections against [James] are of no weight, which are taken from the seeming disagreement between the Apostle Paul, and the writer of this epistle, concerning the doctrine of justification; and from his calling the law the perfect law of liberty, and insisting so much on the doctrine of works; all which will be  seen to be agreeable to the other parts of Scripture, and easily reconciled with them; nor is there anything in it unworthy of an apostle and an inspired writer. ” – John Gill in his commentary on James
  • “[James] hath a just title to our respect and belief, and [James] should be received in the church with the same esteem and reverence which we bear to other scriptures.” – Thomas Manton in his exposition of James

I think these thoughts are helpful in approaching the Epistle of James.

January 31, 2012 | Posted in: Bible, Theology | Comments Closed

Comments are closed.