The Doctrines of Grace in Scripture: I Corinthians 2:14

In this series so far, we’ve covered the following passages that directly relate to TULIP: Ephesians 1:3-6 (U), I Thessalonians 5:23-24(P), Jude 1:24 (P),  John 10:26-30 (U, I, P), I Peter 1:4-5 (P), Acts 13:48 (U, I),  John 6:44-45 (T, U, I, P), and Romans 3:9-12 (T).  Here we continue with another passage.

The Text

I Corinthians 2:14 – “The unbeliever does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him. And he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.”” – Paul (NET Bible)

Relevance

Some translations use “natural man” instead of “unbeliever” here.  The significance of this text in relation to the Doctrines of Grace is that this passage shows us the way man’s depravity prevents them from understanding spiritual things and the way the fall has prevented humans from thinking objectively and accurately about spiritual things, apart from divine intervention. This text leads us to the conclusion that it would be impossible for natural man to make “the right spiritual choice” apart from the intervention of the Spirit of God.  It relates very directly to the T in TULIP.

Historical Comments On It

  • “Paul here tacitly imputes it to the pride of the flesh, that mankind dare to condemn as foolish what they do not comprehend, he at the same time shows how great is the weakness or rather bluntness of the human understanding, when he declares it to be incapable of spiritual apprehension. For he teaches, that it is not owing simply to the obstinacy of the human will, but to the impotency, also, of the understanding, that man does not attain to the things of the Spirit. Had he said that men are not willing to be wise, that indeed would have been true, but he states farther that they are not able. Hence we infer, that faith is not in one’s own power, but is divinely conferred. Because they are spiritually discerned That is, the Spirit of God, from whom the doctrine of the gospel comes, is its only true interpreter, to open it up to us. Hence in judging of it, men’s minds must of necessity be in blindness until they are enlightened by the Spirit of God.  Hence infer, that all mankind are by nature destitute of the Spirit of God: otherwise the argument would be inconclusive. It is from the Spirit of God, it is true, that we have that feeble spark of reason which we all enjoy; but at present we are speaking of that special discovery of heavenly wisdom which God vouchsafes to his sons alone.” – John Calvin (1509-1564)
  • “Men unsanctified receive not the things of God. The understanding, through the corruption of nature by the fall, and through the confirmation of this disorder by customary sin, is utterly unapt to receive the rays of divine light; it is prejudiced against them. ” – Matthew Henry (1662-1714)
  • “his understanding, which is shut unto them, must be opened by a divine power” – John Gill (1697 -1771)
  • “He lays the axe at the root of the trees, and doing so, he perceives only two classes of men—the natural and the spiritual. Under the term “natural,” the apostle includes all those persons who are not partakers of the Spirit of God; it matters not how excellent, how estimable, how intelligent, how instructed they may be. If the Spirit of God hath not given to them a new and higher nature than they ever possessed by their creature birth, he puts them all down at once in the list of natural men. They are what they are by nature….These things which are so important, that you should neglect everything else to attend to them, are by you thought folly; these eternal realities, compared with which the world’s highest interests are but as unsubstantial shadows, you pass by as being idle dreams and doubtless they are dreams to you, because you, still being in your natural estate, do not, cannot, will not, receive the things of the Spirit of God…..So is it with the natural man. He lacks the organs, he has no ear of faith, no eye of faith, and he cannot therefore receive the things of God; they are foolishness to him.But more than this—not only does he lack taste and lack organs, but he actually lacks the nature which could appreciate these things.” -Charles Spurgeon (1834-1892)
  • “But by total depravity, or total incapability, we also mean that man cannot change his fundamental preference for sin and self……Read this chapter very carefully and you will find that the apostles entire case is that the natural person, this person who is in the condition of the flesh, not only cannot change his nature, but also has no understanding or appreciation of spiritual truth.” – D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones (1899-1991)
  • “One of the clearest passages teaching the inability of natural man to understand the things of God is I Corinthians 1 and 2…The reason that brilliant minds do not accept Christianity is that all minds are blind, unless they are regenerated…[quotes passage]…In other words, without the Holy Spirit one is not able to understand the things of God.” – Edwin H. Palmer (?-?)
  • “There is a fundamental incapacity in the natural man. He does not accept the things of the Spirit of God (willful rejection), for they are foolishness to him. Why are they foolishness? Because he is not a spiritual man. He cannot (not ‘does not’ or ‘normally chooses not to’) understand them. This is another phrase of inability….This is not to say that there are not unregenerate, unsaved men who understand the outlines of Christian theology….What it does mean is that there is no unregenerate man who spiritually accepts, understands, and knows the things of God. They exist on a level he cannot access, the spiritual level, and he is spiritually dead.” – James White (1962-Present)

The Doctrines of Grace in Scripture: Romans 3:9-12

In this series so far, we’ve covered the following passages that directly relate to TULIP: Ephesians 1:3-6 (U), I Thessalonians 5:23-24(P), Jude 1:24 (P),  John 10:26-30 (U, I, P), I Peter 1:4-5 (P), Acts 13:48 (U, I), and John 6:44-45 (T, U, I, P).  Here we continue with another passage.

The Text

Romans 3:9-12 – “What then? Are we better off? Certainly not, for we have already charged that Jews and Greeks alike are all under sin,  just as it is written:“There is no one righteous, not even one, there is no one who understands,there is no one who seeks God. All have turned away,together they have become worthless; there is no one who shows kindness, not even one.”” – Paul (NET Bible)

Relevance

The significance of this text in relation to the Doctrines of Grace is that this passage shows us man’s depravity and inability to come to spiritual good on his own and his need for the sovereign act of God in order to seek Him.  It relates very directly to the T in TULIP.

Historical Comments On It

  • “…there is no doubt but that the character of men is described in those words, in order that we may see what man is when left to himself; for Scripture testifies that all men are in this state, who are not regenerated by the grace of God. The condition of the saints would be nothing better, were not this depravity corrected in them: and that they may still remember that they differ nothing from others by nature, they do find in the relics of their flesh (by which they are always encompassed) the seeds of those evils, which would constantly produce fruits, were they not prevented by being mortified; and for this mortification they are indebted to God’s mercy and not to their own nature. We may add, that though all the vices here enumerated are not found conspicuously in every individual, yet they may be justly and truly ascribed to human nature” – John Calvin (1509-1564)
  • “The fault lies in the corruption of the understanding; that is blinded, depraved, perverted. Religion and righteousness have so much reason on their side that if people had but any understanding they would be better and do better. But they do not understand. Sinners are fools….Those may justly be reckoned to have no understanding that do not seek after God. The carnal mind is so far from seeking after God that really it is enmity against him….Even in those actions of sinners that have some goodness in them there is a fundamental error in the principle and end.” – Matthew Henry (1662-1714)
  • “There is none righteous as Adam was, in a state of innocence; for all have sinned, and are filled with unrighteousness, and are enemies to righteousness; none are righteous by their obedience to the law of works; nor are there any righteous in the sight of God, upon the foot of their own righteousness, however they may appear in their own eyes, and in the sight of others; nor are any inherently righteous, for there is none without sin… they have no understanding of things spiritual; no spiritual knowledge of God; no true sense of themselves, their sin and misery; nor do they truly know the way of salvation by Christ; nor have they any experience of the work of the Spirit of God upon their souls; nor any experimental knowledge of the doctrines of the Gospel: no man can understand these of himself….for so men being corrupted by sin, are of no use, service, and advantage to God, to men, or to themselves; but, on the contrary, nauseous to God, and to all that are good, and hurtful to themselves and others…There is none that can do good in a spiritual manner, without the grace of God, strength from Christ, and the assistance of the Spirit” – John Gill (1697 -1771)
  • “This is a declaration of the universal sinfulness of men…..Blinded by sin to the perfections and loveliness of God and truth, they have turned from the way which he has prescribed….they have no correct apprehension of God….This depravity is universal.” -Charles Hodge (1797-1878)
  • “Paul summarizes the condition of every human being apart from the grace of God in Jesus Christ….This is a serious, indeed a devastating picture of the race, because it portrays human beings as unable to do a single thing either to please, understand, or seek after God. Sin corrupts the heart, the mind, and the will….According to Romans 3, no one unaided by God 1) has any righteousness by which to lay a claim upon God, 2) has any true understanding of God, 3) seeks God.” – James Montogmery Boice (1938-2000)
  • “Our problem with sin is that it is rooted in the core of our being. It permeates our hearts. It is because sin is at our core and not merely at the exterior of our lives” – R.C. Sproul (1939-Present)
  • ” [I]t is the bent of our nature to exalt our capacities, not to honestly recognize our limitations. But while many are willing to confess the universal existence of sin, it is the universal debility sin brings that is so offensive to the world’s religion and the natural man. Paul asserts that there are none who seek after God…Yet, if there is no God-seeker, how can anyone be saved? Because there is a sinner-seeker, a Savior….That is the vast differences between man’s religions and the Christian faith: One is focused upon man and his abilities…one upon God and His” – James White (1962-Present)

The Doctrines of Grace in Scripture: I Thessalonians 5:23-24

The Text

I Thessalonians 5:23-24 – “Now may the God of peace himself make you completely holy and may your spirit and soul and body be kept entirely blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. He who calls you is trustworthy, and he will in fact do this.” (Paul, NET Bible)

Relevance

The significance of this text in relation to the Doctrines of Grace is that this passage shows us God’s commitment to (and trustworthiness in) sovereignly preserving His children to the very last day. It relates very directly to the P in TULIP.

Historical Comments On It

  • “Hence our calling ought to be held by us as an evidence of everlasting grace, for he will not leave the work of his hands incomplete. ” – John Calvin (1509-1564)
  • “Two things the apostle mentions as the ground of confidence that the above petition, would be heard and answered….that God would wholly sanctify them, and preserve the whole of them blameless to the coming of Christ; and they are the faithfulness of God, and the effectual calling of his saints. God is faithful to his word, his covenant and promises; he has promised to sanctify and cleanse his people from all their sins, and to preserve them safe to his kingdom and glory…and the effectual calling is a sure pledge of glorification; whom God calls he justifies and glorifies; as sure as he gives grace, he will give glory; and whom he calls to his eternal glory, he will make perfect, stablish, strengthen, and settle” – John Gill (1697 -1771)
  • “Where the good work of grace is begun, it shall be carried on, be protected and preserved; and all those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus shall be preserved to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. And because, if God did not carry on his good work in the soul, it would miscarry, we should pray to God to perfect his work, and preserve us blameless….The kindness and love of God had appeared to them in calling them to the knowledge of his truth, and the faithfulness of God was their security that they should persevere to the end; and therefore, the apostle assures them, God would do what he desired; he would effect what he had promised; he would accomplish all the good pleasure of his goodness towards them. Note, Our fidelity to God depends upon his faithfulness to us.’” – Matthew Henry (1662-1714)
  • “I hope you begin to feel what this means for the foundations of your assurance. It means that every successive step of your salvation is rooted in the certainty of all the steps that have gone before. Your sanctification is rooted in your call and guaranteed by your call. Your call is rooted in the death of Christ for sinners. The death of Christ is rooted in predestination and predestination is rooted in election. Once you feel yourself caught up in this great, objective, God-wrought salvation, you know yourself loved with an omnipotent, everlasting, electing, predestining, atoning, calling, sanctifying, saving love. And you sing, ‘God is faithful. He will do it!’” – John Piper (1946-Present)
  • “You know what Paul is saying? He’s saying a prayer and he says here I know it will get answered…God has to sanctify you, He has to preserve you, He has to make you without blame at the coming of Jesus. Why? He promised, faithful is He who calls you. That’s God. God is faithful. God is faithful….in 1 Corinthians 10. ‘God is faithful who will not allow you to be tempted above that you are…what?…able,’ therefore you will never lose your salvation. He’ll be faithful to keep you from ever being tempted to the point that you could. Don’t have any fear about the end, don’t have any fear about the ultimate sanctification, don’t have any fear about the ongoing continuing persevering sanctifying work of God, He promised it, He will do it…faithful is He who calls you. Again that’s the efficacious call to salvation. When He called you, He’ll do it. He does what He says. Scripture is loaded with testimony to the faithfulness of God. So the Christian can be certain of his perseverance. His salvation is secure. God graciously calls. Then God supplies the grace to believe. Then God supplies the grace to persevere and be kept for the glory of the final sanctification.” – John MacArthur (1939-Present)

It’s Amazing How Things Have Changed

“Though I cannot speak to you, yet I pray for you; and hope that my God will hear me, and in due time bring me to live again amongst you, if you shall see such a mercy fit to be bestowed on me or you. However, we must endeavor by patient waiting to submit to his will without murmuring; and not to think amiss of his chastening us, knowing that all his works are the products of his infinite wisdom, his designs are the advancement of his own glory; and his ends towards his people their sanctification and salvation, which certainly shall be accomplished at last, however his great providences may seem contrary to it, as to our apprehensions….”

- Isaac Watts Sr. in a letter to his children (the oldest being 11) [as quoted in a book by Douglas Wilson].

Reading this makes one wonder about our culture as a whole. A few questions pop into my mind. Let’s assume for a minute that we converted the language into modern English (so there wasn’t the difficulty with reading the dated English)

1. How many adult Christians nowadays (let alone young children) have a theological understanding so deep where someone would write to them in this manner and expect them to get it?

2. If you examined your typical sermon today in a typical evangelical church, would it have as much content as this paragraph?

3.  If we send it to a collection of 20 year olds, how confident would we be that they comprehended it fully?

4.  What age-level would we assign it to?

The Doctrines of Grace in Scripture: Jude 1: 24

The Text

Jude 1:24 – “Now to the one who is able to keep you from falling, and to cause you to stand, rejoicing, without blemish before his glorious presence,” (NET Bible)

Relevance

The significance of this text in relation to the Doctrines of Grace is that this passage shows us the way God is powerful enough to be able to keep his people from falling and He fully capable of presenting believers without blemish before His presence.  So, not only is it God’s will that believers not fall, He is also sovereign enough to carry that out to its completion before His glorious presence. It relates very directly to the P in TULIP.

Historical Comments On It

  • “but he speaketh here of such a power as is engaged by promise and office. Christ, who is the guardian of believers, hath received a charge concerning them, and is to preserve them from total destruction.” – Thomas Manton (1620-1677)
  • “The people of God are liable to falling into temptation, into sin, into errors and mistakes, from an exercise of grace, or from a degree of steadfastness in Gospel truths, and even into a final and total apostasy, were it not for divine power; and they are not able to keep themselves. Adam, in his state of innocence, could not keep himself from falling; nor could the angels, many of whom fell, and the rest are preserved by the grace of God; wherefore, much less can imperfect sinful men keep themselves, they want both skill and power to do it; nor can any, short of Christ, keep them, and it is his work and office to preserve them; they were given to him with this view, and he undertook to do it; and sensible sinners commit themselves to him, as being appointed for that purpose; and this is a work Christ has been, and is, employed in, and he is every way qualified for it: he is “able” to do it, for he is the mighty God, the Creator and upholder of all things; and as Mediator, he has all power in heaven and in earth; instances of persons kept by him prove it; and there is such evidence of it, that believers may be, and are persuaded of it: and he is as willing as he is able; it is his Father’s will he should keep them, and in that he delights; and as he has undertook to keep them, he is accountable for them; besides, he has an interest in them, and the greatest love and affection for them; to which may be added, that the glory of the Father, Son, and Spirit, in man’s salvation, depends on the keeping of them: and what he keeps them from is, from falling by temptations, not from being tempted by Satan, but from sinking under his temptations, and from being devoured by him; and from falling by sin, not from the being or commission of sin, but from the dominion of it, and from the falling into it, so as to perish by it” – John Gill (1697 -1771)
  • “[T]here is nothing in the universe that can separate the elect from the love of God. The One who chose to save you ‘is able to keep you from stumbling, and to make you stand in the presence of His glory blameless with great joy’” – John MacArthur (1939-Present)
  • “Our security is rooted in God’s daily keeping, not our past decisions.” – John Piper (1946-Present)

The Doctrines of Grace in Scripture: Acts 13:48

In this series so far, we’ve covered Ephesians 1:3-6, John 10:26-30, I Peter 1:4-5, and John 6:44-45.  Here we continue with another passage.

The Text

Acts 13:48 – “When the Gentiles heard this, they began to rejoice and praise the word of the Lord, and all who had been appointed for eternal life believed.” – Luke (NET Bible)

Relevance

The significance of this text in relation to the Doctrines of Grace is that this passage shows us God’s electing grace wherein believers were chosen, and how all of those who were first appointed to eternal life subsequently believe.   It shows that God does not elect on the basis of some forseen faith, but rather faith proceeds out of election. It relates very directly to the U and I in TULIP.

Historical Comments On It

  • “For it is a ridiculous cavil to refer this unto the affection of those which believed, as if those received the gospel whose minds were well-disposed. For this ordaining must be understood of the eternal counsel of God alone. Neither doth Luke say that they were ordained unto faith, but unto life; because the Lord doth predestinate his unto the inheritance of eternal life. And this place teacheth that faith dependeth upon God’s election. And assuredly, seeing that the whole race of mankind is blind and stubborn, those diseases stick fast in our nature until they be redressed by the grace of the Spirit, and that redressing floweth from the fountain of election alone….For he doth not begin to choose us after that we believe; but he sealeth his adoption, which was hidden in our hearts, by the gift of faith, that it may be manifest and sure….Therefore, let us hold and mark that which Luke saith, that those were ordained before unto life, who, being in-grafted into the body of Christ by faith, do receive the earnest and pledge of their adoption in Christ. Whence we do also gather what force the preaching of the gospel hath of itself. For it doth not find faith in men, save only because God doth call those inwardly whom he hath chosen, and because he draweth those who were his own before unto Christ” – John Calvin (1509-1564)
  • “faith is not the cause, or condition of the decree of eternal life, but a means fixed in it, and is a fruit and effect of it,” – John Gill (1697 -1771)
  • “the demonstrative part of [the greek word for 'all who'] must be the subject of the first verb, and the relative part the subject of the second. Hence it is impossible to render ‘those who believed were appointed’ ” – Horatio B. Hackett (1808-1875)
  • ” He says that those who have been appointed to eternal life believe. This divine appointment precedes and brings about the act of faith. God has appointed them to eternal life, and they believe. Obviously, this statement touches upon not only unconditional election, but upon irresistible grace as well…A survey of published English translations shows that there is really no question about how this passage should be translated. ” – James White (1962-Present)
  • “Here is the explicit statement of the doctrine of election by Luke. The Greek word tetagmenoi, which is translated as ordained (KJV, ASV, RSV), appointed (NKJV, NASB, Berkeley) and destined (JB) is the passive form of the verb tasso which (as might be expected) means to ordain, or to appoint. The fact that the verb is passive indicates that these people did not ordain themselves but were chosen by an outside agent—God the Father. These people believed in Christ because God first appointed them to eternal life. Luke, by the Holy Spirit, is stating in unambiguous terms why some people believe and others disbelieve. The difference is not that some people are smarter, wiser, or more holy than others, but that God has chosen or ordained some to life and passed by the rest. ” – Brian Schwertley (?-?)

John Stott: The Bird Watcher

In the last little while, a lot of people have been speaking about the recent death of Anglican Christian leader John Stott.

I wonder, however, how many of these people actually know about one of the biggest passions in his life? I wonder how many realize that he was also an avid bird watcher?

So much so, in fact, that John Stott actually wrote a book called The Birds Our Teachers: Biblical Lessons From A Lifelong Bird-Watcher.  But not only did he write the book, showing amazing knowledge of birds,  he also includes in the book more than 150 of his (amazing) bird photographs. It’s a highly wonderful volume rich with great lessons and great photos, especially the rare photos of the Snowy Owls!

The book also reveals that John has seen about 2,500 of the world’s estimated 9,000 bird species!

 

A Review of a Presentation by Bob Freund: “Doctrines of the Remnant” [Slides 34-43]

Introduction

In my first and second posts in this review, I reviewed the slides from a historical-theological presentation that Bob Freund did entitled “Doctrines of the Remnant” at the Kitchener Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarean).

 

Interestingly enough, the Kitchener congregation is the church where I spent the earliest years of my life. I was not at this presentation, although I have been to one or two similar ones by Bob Freund in the past. In my previous posts as well as this one, I want to make it clear that even though parts of my review are undoubtedly critical, I do not want people to interpret this as a person slight about brother Bob. I’m merely critiquing the content of these slides, which I believe to some degree are errant, lacking and misleading.

 

Sources: Selective and Errant

At slide 34, Bob begins a review of church history from the fourth century until the Reformation. Any suspicion that that we might get a fair treatment of the history of the Protestant Reformation is immediately dismissed when, in outlining the extent of his coverage refers to it as the “So-Called Reformation”. Bob first looks at the dates AD 303, AD 313, and AD 325.

 

Now, I am no advocate of infant baptism (being a Baptist), but Bob appears to make a historical error in claiming that infant baptism didn’t begin until AD 303.  Immediately, we will see the nature of Bob’s usage of Early Church sources.  Inconsistent and very selective. The very Hippolytus (whose side Bob implicitly took in the controversy over reinstatement against Callistus) in AD 215 said “Baptize first the children, and if they can speak for themselves let them do so. Otherwise, let their parents or other relatives speak for them”.

 

And then there is Origen, who Bob also quotes as a source elsewhere, who said in AD 248: “The Church received from the apostles the tradition of giving baptism even to infants.” and “In the Church, baptism is given for the remission of sins, and, according to the usage of the Church, baptism is given even to infants.”. Not only did Origen advocate infant baptism, but he also traced it back to the apostles.

 

Now, lest anyone misunderstand, I will repeat, I am a Baptist and do not agree with infant baptism, but I’m focusing on this to show the nature of the usage of the early church sources in this presentation.

 

Of Waldo, Augustine, the Reformation, and the Anabaptists

Moving along, Bob reviews dates such as AD 354, 414, 606, 1155, and 1440. He cites Augustine as a strong influence on the Protestant Reformation and Peter Waldo, who is said to reveal the first evidences of the Anabaptist faith.

He then discusses the Anabaptists, moving to give information about the Schleitheim Confession, comparing it to the ACCN statement of faith with the purpose of showing the similarity. Then he very briefly reviews some history regarding Menno Simmons, the Quakers, and then proceeds into a discussion of Samuel Froehlich.

I think to some degree, given the nature of his talk, Bob’s discussion of both the Protestant Reformation and the Anabaptist movement is rather simplistic and brief. We are left knowing really nothing about names like Martin Luther, John Calvin, Menno Simmons, Conrad Grebel, etc. (other than their names)

 

Froehlich

The massacre of Protestants is mentioned to setup the history of Samuel Froehlich, the man whose missionary endeavors is the source of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarean) denomination and it briefly lays out how this new Froehlichian faith spread to Eastern Europe and North America.

 

The last two slides then wrap up with a quote from a quote from an anonymous Christian from 130 AD  and an exhortation prompted by a quote from a figure in ACCN history, Henry Michel, saying “Not boasting, but we have the best thing in the world. The more welook at it, the more we have to marvel how much light was given toour brothers, and how much light is given to us in our time.”

 

Concluding Thoughts

Now that I’ve reviewed the entirety of this presentation, I would like to list some ways these slides are unhelpful in understanding Christian history.

  1. They present a degree of uniformity among the first few centuries of Christianity that never existed.
  2. Through selective and problematic usage of early church sources, it loses credibility and disrespects the original sources.
  3. The way the early church is presented as a reliable guide could actually mislead some people into delving into unrelated errors based on superficial readings of the church fathers. Rather than presenting the early church consensus as a complicated matter that needs to be studied carefully, Bob dangerously presents it as if it is easy to determine.
  4. The early church consensus on some matters (which didn’t even exist) is presented as support for going against the clear teaching of the scriptures.
  5. History is flattened in an unhelpful and hurtful way (even though Bob certainly wouldn’t say that, the basic thought presented is: Protestants are bad, Anabaptists are good, Early Church Fathers are good  and they support the Anabaptist positions). This presentation, while good intentioned, flattens history to the point of, at times, distortion.
  6. This presentation leaves a dangerous pattern of selective quotes and also at times, inaccurate quotes.
  7. This presentation propagates the errant assumption that the earliest sources are always the best and most reliable and that proximity always means accuracy.
  8. This presentation seems geared to induce a sort of smug superiority and exclusivity (ie. “we have the best thing in the world… as if other believers who have a genuine Gospel can’t have it too).

Now, let’s not pretend that some of these issues are not things we can all fall into. I myself struggle with the whole idea of the usage of sources, it’s very hard to be careful and accurate in the way one uses sources. So then, this critique of Bob’s presentation, not only should challenge Bob and his presentation, but also me, and whoever is reading this. How am I using sources in the material I put out there?  It’s a good thing to remember. We will never be perfect writers or researchers, but we can improve!