Intellectuals in the Nanny State

“The snooty point of it all is that to most of the intellectuals who have entered politics, Americans are a rather dumb lot who, without the help of the elite, would squander their resources, wreck their families, litter the streets, be impolite to their neighbors, lynch everyone is sight, burn the books, break the violins, sack the museums, spit on the pavement, smell, eat garlic, drink beer, belch in public, be unkind to dogs, use abstract paintings as designs in their kitchen linoleum, watch baseball, go to movies with happy endings, scratch themselves, dress unstylishly, and otherwise be helpless clods.

I have found little difference in this attitude between intellectuals who call themselves conservative and those who call themselves liberal. On the other hand, it is not true that all intellectuals feel this way. On the contrary, the people who have most effectively criticized such intellectuals are, not surprisingly, other intellectuals who, although they work with their heads instead of their hands, understand that they are working, that they have a lot in common with, and are not superior to or separate from, people who do other kinds of work. A physicist or a historian is, of course, more likely to be a better physicist or historian than a welder but that may be precisely where the ‘better’ argument starts and should stop– not forgetting that the welder may be a better welder and that, very probably, they’ll all be quite equal in virtually every other skill of living, honesty, decency, regard for others, and so forth.”

Karl Hess in Dear America, 1975, p114-115

..And Enjoy Him Forever

Often when we in the evangelical and orthodox circles talk about the purpose of man, we quote from the first answer of the Westminster Catechism: “Man’s chief end is to glorify God.” And often the sentence is ended there. This completely changes our Reformation forefathers’ understanding of the Scriptures. If you are going to give the complete biblical answer, you must finish their sentence: “Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy Him forever.” That changes the whole view of life.

Francis Schaeffer in Death in the City, Crossway Books, p41

Booklog (May 1 – June 2)

  • Liberalism by Ludwig Von Mises: Fantabulous presentation of classical liberalism
  • Route 66 to Vietnam: A Draftee’s Story by Michael Lund: *Yawn*
  • The Dialectics of Liberation by David Cooper: Entertaining, prophetic, delusional presentations from 1967 radical conference, notable for calling out the nationalization of Ford 40 years ahead of time
  • Just Do Something: How to Make a Decision Without Dreams, Visions, Fleeces, Open Doors, Random Bible Verses, Casting Lots, Liver Shivers, Writing in the Sky, etc. by Kevin DeYoung:  Excellent and must-read, or so my fleece said
  • Reefer Madness: Sex, Drugs, and Cheap Labor in the American Black Market by Eric Schlosser: Fascinating, but annoying
  • For What It’s Worth: The Story of Buffalo Springfield by John Einarson: Great stuff
  • Since Then: How I Survived Everything and Lived to Tell About It by David Crosby: Couldn’t wait to put this one down
  • What he must be – - if he wants to marry my daughter by Voddie Baucham: Aggressive and helpful
  • Government in the Future by Noam Chomsky: Mildly interesting, irritatingly shallow at some points
  • The Dead book: A social history of the Grateful Dead by Hank Harrison: Loads of early tidbits for the hardcore fan, but convoluted and hard to follow
  • Service with a Smile by P.G. Wodehouse: Pretty good, but not Wodehouse’s greatest
  • The Fall of Christendom and the Rise of the Church by Peter Pikkert:  Good sweeping survey with perhaps a few rough edges, but still highly useful!

Ernest Hemingway on Communism

“…I cannot be a communist now because I believe in only one thing: liberty. First I would look after myself and do my work. Then I would care for my family. Then I would help my neighbor. But the state I care nothing for. All the state has ever meant to me is unjust taxation..I believe in the absolute minimum of government.”

The Schaffer Dictionary

Several issues of Murray Rothbard’s The Libertarian publication contained a piece called “The Schaffer Dictionary”. In it, Butler Schaffer would list a few humorous definitions of some words pertaining to liberty, politics, etc.

Here are a few good ones from Volume II, NOS. 22-23 (1970):

EDUCATION: the method I use to promote my ideas.

PROPAGANDA: the method you use to promote your ideas.

DO-GOODER: one who has demonstrated total incompetence  at handling his own affairs, and who seeks to make this talent available to others.

POLITICIAN: one who, recognizing the value of truth and reason, seeks to preserve the same by economizing their use.